PDB11 COMPARISON OF MULTIVARIABLE-ADJUSTED LOGISTIC REGRESSION WITH PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED, PROPENSITY SCORE-STRATIFIED, AND PROPENSITY SCORE-ADJUSTED LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The PAIP Score: A Propensity-Adjusted Interviewer Performance Indicator
Evaluating interviewers based on their response rates is complicated in most surveys. By random chance, interviewers may call cases that are more or less difficult to interview. In addition, interviewer response rates can only imperfectly be computed because of the contributions of other interviewers’ prior contacts with those cases (calling a case after a contact from an expert interviewer may...
متن کاملPropensity score-based diagnostics for categorical response regression models.
For binary or categorical response models, most goodness-of-fit statistics are based on the notion of partitioning the subjects into groups or regions and comparing the observed and predicted responses in these regions by a suitable chi-squared distribution. Existing strategies create this partition based on the predicted response probabilities, or propensity scores, from the fitted model. In t...
متن کاملSystematic differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score methods and logistic regression.
BACKGROUND In medical research both propensity score methods and logistic regression analysis are used to estimate treatment effects in observational studies. From literature reviews it has been concluded that treatment effect estimates from both methods are quite similar. With this study we will show that there are systematic differences which can be substantial. METHODS We used a simulated ...
متن کاملThe role of prediction modeling in propensity score estimation: an evaluation of logistic regression, bCART, and the covariate-balancing propensity score.
The covariate-balancing propensity score (CBPS) extends logistic regression to simultaneously optimize covariate balance and treatment prediction. Although the CBPS has been shown to perform well in certain settings, its performance has not been evaluated in settings specific to pharmacoepidemiology and large database research. In this study, we use both simulations and empirical data to compar...
متن کاملComment: Analyzing propensity score matched count data.
We offer an explanation to the simulation result of Austin (2009) regarding rate ratios, and argue that unmatched analysis of propensity score matched count data results in conservative statistical inferences on the rate ratios.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Value in Health
سال: 2011
ISSN: 1098-3015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.02.519